Game one of the NBA Finals brought us an Allen Iverson salute and (apparently) a Rihanna stare-down.
And here you thought this was about pro basketball’s two best teams vying for a championship – and Golden State drawing first blood with a 113-91 rout of Cleveland.
But no.
First, Rihanna was all …
Listen: Rihanna yells "BRIIIIIICK!!!" at Durant during free throw, he stares her down twice 😂 (h/t @tshent) pic.twitter.com/XYdFOv9mc3
— Rob Perez (@World_Wide_Wob) June 2, 2017
And Kevin Durant, amid a 38-point performance, was all …
Looks like Kevin Durant may have stared down Rihanna after that 3-pointer pic.twitter.com/Lkf3SEQ14Z
— Jordan Greer (@jordangreer42) June 2, 2017
And after the game KD was all …
Reporter: "…you looked towards the crowd towards Rihanna. Was that on purpose?"
KD: "I dont even remember that."#NBAFinals pic.twitter.com/P4AIN2zyun
— NBA on TNT (@NBAonTNT) June 2, 2017
And then Rihanna was all (NSFW) …
Rihanna: "The King is still King, b—-!" via @rachelnmarcus pic.twitter.com/woA5DDP87y
— Arash Markazi (@ArashMarkazi) June 2, 2017
This is all terribly fascinating, of course. And at this rate Durant will have to deal with the wrath of Joel Embiid, who long ago took a shine to Rihanna.
As for Iverson, Stephen Curry, who finished with 28 points, said he wore an arm sleeve for the following reason:
'Low key I've always wanted to be like Allen Iverson. That was the only way I could come close' — Steph on why he wore the elbow sleeve pic.twitter.com/2iZSWM3i79
— Sports Illustrated (@SInow) June 2, 2017
Funny thing here is that I have often gotten the impression on TV that Oracle Arena reacts to Curry in much the same way the Wells Fargo Center reacted to Iverson in his heyday. That the paying customers had a particular affection for a little big man.
Those who have actually been in Oracle for games swear to me that that’s not true — that the fans react to the team as a whole, not just Curry. And who can blame them? It’s just so lovely to watch – the ball movement, the artistry, the unselfishness.
As for the game itself, it’s a mistake to put too much stock in the result of the first game of a series. The Warriors won the opener last year, too, en route to their ill-fated 3-1 lead. Then the Cavs staged a comeback for the ages.
That said, the Dubs played like a team with a score to settle. They were plus-16 on turnovers, coughing it up just four times and forcing 20 giveaways. They were outrebounded, 59-50, but it didn’t seem it; they appeared a step quicker than Cleveland to loose balls, all night long.
And here’s the thing about the Warriors – they can play better. They were just 28-for-56 on shots in the paint, and made a tepid 42.5 percent of their attempts in all. Klay Thompson went 3-for-16, and Draymond Green was 3-for-12 (though both excelled on defense).
Cleveland will certainly make a stand; LeBron and Kyrie are simply too good for that not to happen. But for one night, at least, the Warriors gave the Cavs a lot to think about.
Gordie:
Isn’t it interesting that Iverson increasingly gets the NBA God treatment, even (especially?) from people too young to remember him in any detail? I don’t dislike AI; he might be one of the five best raw athletes I’ve ever seen, he was admirable in a lot of ways and definitely made things interesting around here, but to say he came with some baggage/flaws is an understatement. It’s like time passes and people can’t see, or remember, or want to see and remember, the full picture.
First off, you get the home version of our game for being the first to comment on the site. As for the Iverson thing, I think it’s a time-healing-all-wounds kinda thing. Because in just about every sense Curry is different than Iverson — playing-style-wise, off-court comportment, etc. But if you grow up seeing the highlights, seeing how tough he was, seeing how he was very much his own man, that tends to make an impression.